Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jennifer Ruhala's avatar

I agree with you that Charles should demote them so to speak. They should be the Earl and Countess of Dumbarton. To be honest it’s still much more than they deserve. Considering that Meghan looked down her nose at the Queen and refused the title she so graciously offered to Archie, was such an enormous sign of disrespect. I believe that neither of their children are deserving of titles or a place in the LOS. The mysterious moon bump debacle during the first possible pregnancy, the secrecy surrounding his birth, the lack of witnesses, considering all other royal births have 3-4 live witnesses who can attest to the fact that the royal baby was born of the biological mother’s body. The lies and deception used by the Sussexes during the labor and birth. Their putative daughter should have automatically been denied a place in the succession to the throne. She was not born, nor has she ever lived in the country that she could one day be made to rule. At the time of her birth her parents had left that life behind and made it crystal clear they were never returning. That’s not to mean she shouldn’t have a place in the family or the history books, she should, but I believe if children are born to parents who voluntarily left their royal life and duties behind to live and work abroad beginning a new life the children born and raised abroad should not be eligible. Better yet would be to take Harry and the two putative children remove them altogether. It’s surprising that there is no law stating royal children with a title and place in the LoS must be raised in the UK or one of the Commonwealth Counties associated with that Monarch. At the very least this should be added by KC to the letters patent. I believe that upon leaving royal life, all title’s issued by the monarch should resort back to the crown and only inherited titles may be retained, but only used I’d working on behalf of the crown.

Expand full comment
SusanSays's avatar

Yes, the Dumbarton title would be fitting.

The "nonexistent relationship" is the only one possible for nonexistent children.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts